The struggle is this: Should we value autonomy (freedom) above the right to live? Or should we so value life - which must come to an end - above freedom that we give up significant rights?
At this point, many of my readers might think I am talking about the pro-life/pro-choice debate. Indeed, that is where I saw this struggle play out for several years. However, I did not notice the scale and weight of it until this week as I watched a video of a woman speaking about COVID-19.
COVID-19? The virus currently causing panic and destruction across the globe?
Yes.
The woman was questioning, as several others are, whether it was right to shut down the entire country (actually a whole bunch of countries) in order to save a few lives.
One of her main points was that our individual rights are being trampled. Many people are currently unable to even earn the money required to feed their families and pay their rent because the government has mandated an economic shutdown. That's a fair point. How far should a government be able to go in limiting personal rights and freedoms? A lot of people are asking that question right now. The problem is not that we are being asked to stay home and take precautions, but that we are being told what we may and may not do. I can understand the concern here.
Another of the speaker's points was - to my understanding - that life is not a right, but rather a privilege. She argued that everyone will eventually die, so we do not actually have a right to live. Furthermore, she argued that the life of any one individual doesn't really matter in the larger scheme of things, so while loved ones may grieve the individual's death, it might be better for that person to die than for many others to suffer to save that one person. That argument took me aback, but I could see her way of thinking, although I did not agree.
Overall, the video left me with an icky feeling, but I had trouble figuring out why until I had sorted out the larger struggle.
Our culture clings so tightly to many rights and freedoms that a single right (the right to life) seems like a small sacrifice, if only we can keep all of the other rights and freedoms. When I understood this key way of setting priorities, I could see clearly to understand the woman's argument. Beyond that, I was able to begin figuring out how I should be thinking about such issues.
Rights and freedoms aren't bad things. Generally, people find them to be very good things. Likewise, life is also considered to be good. In fact, if rights and freedoms were evil, or if life was, the struggle wouldn't exist. You see, the struggle is not between good and evil, right and wrong. It is between two good things: freedom and life.
That makes this all a bit more confusing, doesn't it?
Life is good, so we try to preserve it in reasonable ways in every given situation. We wear personal protective gear on work sites and practice social distancing in pandemics.
Freedom is good, so we try to preserve it in reasonable ways in every given situation. We protest in front of government buildings when our rights are overrun and we question government decisions, even in times of emergency.
Unfortunately, in some situations - like abortion and COVID-19 - these two good things surprise us by clashing. Now what are we to do?
I don't know what the general populace is supposed to do or think, but as a Christian, I do know what I should be doing with this struggle.
The apostle Paul, in his letter to the Philippian church, writes,
Therefore, if you have any encouragement from being united with Christ, if any comfort from his love, any common sharing in the Spirit, if any tenderness and compassion, then make my joy complete by being like-minded, having the same love, being one in spirit and of one mind. Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves, not looking to your own interests but each of you to the interests of the others.
In your relationships with one another, have the same mindset as Christ Jesus:
Who, being in very nature God,
did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;
rather, he made himself nothing
by taking the very nature of a servant,
being made in human likeness.
And being found in appearance as a man,
he humbled himself
by becoming obedient to death -
even death on a cross!
Therefore God exalted him to the highest place
and gave him the name that is above every name,
that at the name of Jesus, every knee should bow,
in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
and every tongue acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord,
to the glory of God the Father.
(Philippians 2:1-11, NIV)
As creator of the universe, Jesus had rights unimaginably greater than our own! Yet, he gave up those rights. He gave up equality with God, becoming human and even submitting to human authority. And he allowed himself to be killed in the most humiliating, excruciatingly painful way.
Why?
Chapters 5 and 6 of the Book of Romans tell us that Christ's death and subsequent resurrection gave us life. Abundant life! Eternal life! The theme of life flows continuously through the Bible. Death is also very real and present throughout the Biblical narrative, but it is a consequence of evil, whereas life - both life on earth and eternal life - is a precious gift from God.
In short, Jesus freely gave up his incredible rights in order that the very people who put him on the cross might be offered the gift of Life.
As Christians, we are to follow Christ's example, presenting His image to the world. As I see it, that means that we voluntarily give up our rights in order to protect life. In an unplanned pregnancy, that means the mother gives up her right to comfort, convenience, even her own life to protect the life of her child. In the case of a terminally ill patient, that means we all pay the cost to protect the patient's life and dignity to the end, rather than ending it prematurely. In a pandemic, that means we take reasonable steps to slow the spread of the disease, even if it means we bear economic and social hardship.
And yes, I did say that one who follows Jesus should be willing to give up their own right to life to protect God's gift of life to another. Why? Because, as Paul says, "to live is Christ and to die is gain" (Philippians 1:21, NIV). For a Christian, death simply ushers us into more life.
And yes, I did say that one who follows Jesus should be willing to give up their own right to life to protect God's gift of life to another. Why? Because, as Paul says, "to live is Christ and to die is gain" (Philippians 1:21, NIV). For a Christian, death simply ushers us into more life.
Ironically, there is freedom in all of that sacrifice, because we choose to give priority to the well-being of others, rather than being forced into it. Even when the government takes away all of our rights, we are still called to bear the image of Christ and to bring life and light to a dark, death-filled world, just as the early church did and just as Christians in other nations do today.
My challenge for myself and my readers is simple, but not easy: Follow Christ's example and value others above yourselves, whatever that may look like, in whatever situation you may find yourself.
- - -
Note: I know you may still have questions. How can the church support those who are suffering right now? What do I do if I'm the one who is suffering? How do I feed my family when I have been ordered not to work? What if I get sick and bring the virus home to my children or elderly parents? Those are hugely important and practical questions, but they are outside of the scope of this blog post. I am keeping those in prayer who are dealing with these very real questions at this time.